The question of “What Did Carole Baskin Do With The Gw Zoo” has captivated many, fueled by sensationalized documentaries and public fascination. This article aims to provide a clear and straightforward explanation of her involvement and the subsequent fate of the facility.
The Fate of the Gw Zoo Under Carole Baskin’s Influence
The Gw Zoo, formerly known as Greater Wynnewood Exotic Animal Park, became a focal point of public attention following its prominent feature in the documentary series “Tiger King.” Carole Baskin, founder of Big Cat Rescue, had long been an outspoken critic of Joe Exotic, the zoo’s former owner, citing concerns about animal welfare. Her long-standing feud with Exotic culminated in a legal battle over trademark infringement. Ultimately, Baskin was awarded ownership of the Gw Zoo property as part of a court settlement. The importance of this legal victory for Baskin was the ability to implement her vision for animal sanctuary and end what she perceived as exploitative practices.
Following the transfer of ownership, Carole Baskin’s primary objective was to dismantle the operation as it existed under Joe Exotic. This involved:
- Relocating the exotic animals to accredited sanctuaries.
- Dismantling the zoo’s infrastructure that supported the public exhibition of the animals.
- Ensuring the animals received proper care and rehabilitation.
This process was complex, involving various stakeholders and the careful planning required to move large and often dangerous animals. The goal was to transition the location from a tourist attraction to a more humane environment focused on animal rescue and conservation efforts.
Here’s a look at the initial steps taken:
- Securing the property and ensuring the safety of the animals.
- Assessing the health and needs of each individual animal.
- Coordinating with animal welfare organizations for relocation.
The ultimate outcome was that the Gw Zoo, as a public exhibition facility, ceased to operate. The focus shifted entirely to the well-being and rehoming of the animals that had resided there. The property itself was intended to be repurposed for animal advocacy and education, reflecting Baskin’s core mission.
To gain a deeper understanding of the specifics of the legal proceedings and the subsequent actions taken regarding the Gw Zoo, we recommend consulting the official court documents and reports from animal welfare organizations involved in the relocation efforts. These sources will offer detailed accounts of the transition and the care provided to the animals.